Good morning, investors. Today we’re covering, how Buffett generated 130× the market’s return since 1965, the best months for investing, how investors navigate markets during wars, and much more.
Don’t keep us a secret: Share the email with friends.
And, as always, send us feedback by replying to this email.
This Week’s Top Stories

NEED TO KNOW
60 Years Of Warren
From 1965 to 2025, Warren Buffett compounded Berkshire Hathaway at 19.7% per year.
The S&P 500 returned 10.5% over the same period.
But Buffett’s success wasn’t one single strategy.
It evolved through three distinct stages.
Stage 1: The Entrepreneur
Before he became the world’s most famous investor, Buffett was an obsessive young entrepreneur.
By age 12, he already launched a betting tip business called “Stable-Boy Selections.”
By age 14, Buffett invested $1,200 of newspaper profits into Nebraska farmland.
He hired a farmer to work the land and split the income.
He also started a pinball machine business, which he sold for $1,200.
By the time he graduated he was worth $5,000. That’s roughly $55,000 today.
Stage 2: The Aggressive Investor
Buffett’s second phase was his most explosive investing period.
This is when he ran partnerships and aggressively bought undervalued companies.
During this era, he even delivered two separate +100% years in 1976 and 1979.
His philosophy was simple:
“If I was running $1 million today, or $10 million for that matter, I’d be fully invested.”
At that size, opportunities were everywhere.
Buffett aggressively acquired businesses such as:
• The Washington Post Company (1973)
• See’s Candies (1972)
• GEICO
• ABC Broadcasting
• RJ Reynolds
These were small companies back then.
But they had powerful competitive advantages, were mispriced and structurally strong.
Stage 3: The Capital Protector
The third phase is the Buffett most investors know.
By the late 1980s and 1990s, Berkshire Hathaway had become enormous.
Small opportunities no longer moved the needle.
Buffett himself explained the problem:
“The universe I can’t play in has become more attractive than the universe I can play in.”
He had to hunt for “elephants.”
That meant focusing on huge, dominant companies like:
• The Coca-Cola Company
• American Express
• Apple Inc.
By this stage, Buffett’s strategy shifted.
The goal was no longer explosive growth.
It was capital preservation and compounding.
The Real Buffett Strategy
Buffett didn’t follow one formula for 60 years.
He adapted to his size.
1️⃣ Young: Aggressive entrepreneur
2️⃣ Mid-career: Aggressive investor
3️⃣ Late-career: Aggressive protector of capital
This is where many investors make a mistake.
They attempt to replicate late-career Buffett, while operating with the capital and flexibility of early-career Buffett.

CHART OF THE WEEK
History Of Oil
Markets are reacting to escalating tensions in the Middle East.
And energy markets are extremely sensitive to geopolitical risk.
Especially when the conflict involves critical supply routes like the Strait of Hormuz.
Roughly 20% of the world’s oil supply flows through this narrow passage.
So even the possibility of disruption can move prices instantly.
But history shows something important: oil spikes first, and often cools later.
During the Gulf War, oil surged nearly 97% as markets feared major supply losses. Once the situation stabilized, prices dropped more than 50%.
A similar pattern appeared during the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Oil jumped roughly 35% as traders feared shortages, but later retraced as markets adjusted to new supply flows.
Oil shocks typically follow three stages:
Shock: News triggers supply fears and prices jump.
Assessment: Markets evaluate whether supply is actually disrupted.
Normalization: If supply continues, prices stabilize or fall.
That’s why geopolitical oil spikes can look dramatic but often fade.
The key question now is simple: Will supply actually be disrupted?
If shipping continues through the Strait of Hormuz, prices may cool again.
If supply routes break, markets will reprice energy much higher.

Best & Worst Months
The S&P 500 finished February down 1.4%.
Historically, February has never been a particularly strong month for stocks.
Since 1950, it has been one of the weakest months of the year, typically delivering close to 0% average returns.
This raises a simple question:
Will March be any better?
Historical data suggests it often is.
Historically, the S&P 500 averages about +1.13% in March, making it one of the more reliable positive months in the calendar.
Furthermore, average monthly returns show that some months consistently outperform.
For example:
• November averages about +1.82%
• December averages +1.49%
• April averages +1.46%
Meanwhile, weaker months include September (–0.72%), February (~0%), and August (~0%).
That said, seasonality is not a guarantee.
Markets will likely respond more to inflation data, interest-rate expectations, and geopolitical risk than the calendar.

Munger’s #1 Stock
If you invested $10,000 in 2001 into Costco Wholesale…
Today it would be worth roughly $430,000.
That’s a 16.6% annual return for 25 years.
For comparison, the S&P 500 returned 9.7% annually over the same period.
The company was also a favorite of Charlie Munger, who served on Costco’s board for years.
And he famously said:
“I’m a total addict of Costco. I love everything about it. I’m never going to sell a share.”
For Munger, Costco represented the perfect business model.
But occasionally it does something unusual:
Special dividends.
Looking at its history, investors have seen large one-time payouts such as:
• $7 per share in 2017
• $10 per share in 2020
• $15 per share in 2023
These payouts raise an interesting question.
Why distribute so much cash at once?
Costco follows a philosophy similar to many classic value investors.
If management can’t deploy capital at high returns, they give it back to shareholders.
Maybe that’s why Munger loved it so much.

Stocks & Wars
Looking at 86 years of major geopolitical events, the S&P 500 was higher one month later 46% of the time.
That’s basically the same odds as flipping a coin.
In other words:
War headlines create volatility.
But they don’t reliably predict the short-term direction of stocks.
When we zoom out, the pattern becomes clearer.
Across 43 major geopolitical or historical shocks since 1940:
• The S&P 500 was higher 65% of the time after 12 months
• The average return was +3%
That return is lower than the long-term market average, but still positive.
And more importantly:
Markets recover more often than they collapse.
Geopolitical shocks create noise.
But historically they rarely change the long-term direction of markets.
Other Big Things
🦬 Berkshire Signal – Berkshire Hathaway has resumed share buybacks while CEO Greg Abel purchased $15 million worth of company stock.
📉 Tech Slump – The Magnificent Seven tech stocks are experiencing their worst performance in three years.
🤖 AI Strain – Oracle plans to cut thousands of jobs as rising AI spending pressures its finances.
📈 Chip Forecast – Broadcom CEO Hock Tan said the company expects AI chip revenue to exceed $100 billion by 2027.
🏛️ Beijing Caution – China has set its lowest economic growth target since 1991 as the economy struggles to maintain momentum.
🛒 Retail Strength – Costco beat second-quarter revenue and earnings estimates as same-store sales grew 6.7%.